When Polarization Turns Violent

Issue Date July 2026
Volume 37
Issue 3
Page Numbers 38-49
file Print
arrow-down-thin Download from Project MUSE
external View Citation

Read the full essay here.

This essay challenges the assumption that political polarization leads naturally to political violence. Surveying cases from ancient Alexandria and the Russian pogroms to lynching in the American South, Hindu-Muslim riots in India, and the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, the essay argues that polarization turns deadly only when several forces converge: when affective hostility fuses with fears of demographic change and political displacement, when groups come to see control of the polity as a matter of collective survival, and when the state retreats from enforcing equal protection. Mass democracy heightens the danger by translating demographic difference into political power. Yet fatalism is unwarranted—most polarized societies remain peaceful, and Charlottesville did not become a pogrom because institutions held. The United States, the essay concludes, is not on an inevitable path to violence so long as its civic order and sense of common membership endure.

About the Author

Jeffrey S. Kopstein is Chancellor’s Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Irvine. He is the author, most recently, of The Assault on the State: How the Global Attack on Modern Government Endangers Our Future (with Stephen E. Hanson, 2024) and editor of Politics, Violence, Memory: The New Social Science of the Holocaust (with Jelena Subotic and Susan Welch, 2023).

View all work by Jeffrey S. Kopstein

Image Credit: Samuel Corum/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images