| E [yij | xi , in sample] | = E [yij | xi , d=1] = E [yij | xi, a’wi + ui > 0] = b’ xi + E [ei | ui > -a’ wi] = b’ xi + (r se su) {f (-a’ wi) / [1 - F (-f’ wi)]} = b’ xi + (r se su) [f (a’ wi) / F (f’ wi)]}.  | 
| E [yij | xi, in sample] | = b’ xi + (r se) li = b’ xi + q li  | 
| E [yi0 | xi , in sample] | = E [yi0 | xi , d=0] = E [yi0 | xi, a’wi + ui £ 0] = b’ xi + E [ei | ui £ -a’ wi]  | 
| l = f / F | if d = 1 , | and | l = - f / 1 - F | if d = 0 . | 
TABLE 1
Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) by Region
(1960–90 IMR is the mean of observations in the respective region.)
| 
 Region  | 
 1960–90 IMR  | 
 # Observations  | 
| 
 Sub-Saharan Africa  | 
 133  | 
 221  | 
| 
 South Asia  | 
 116  | 
 31  | 
| 
 East Asia  | 
 61  | 
 28  | 
| 
 South East Asia  | 
 57  | 
 50  | 
| 
 Pacific Islands/Oceania  | 
 49  | 
 6  | 
| 
 Middle East/North Africa  | 
 100  | 
 66  | 
| 
 Latin America  | 
 74  | 
 127  | 
| 
 Caribbean and Non-Iberian America  | 
 66  | 
 30  | 
| 
 Eastern Europe/USSR  | 
 23  | 
 35  | 
| 
 Industrial Countries  | 
 17  | 
 487  | 
| 
 Total  | 
 60  | 
 1081  | 
TABLE 2
Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) by Level of Development and by Regime Type
| 
 Level  | 
 Dictatorship  | 
 Democracy  | 
||
| 
 IMR  | 
 #Obs  | 
 IMR  | 
 #Obs  | 
|
| 
 $0-1,999  | 
 1122.7  | 
 320  | 
 95.7  | 
 47  | 
| 
 $2,000-2,999  | 
 84.1  | 
 57  | 
 59.6  | 
 38  | 
| 
 $3,000-3,999  | 
 55.1  | 
 44  | 
 42.6  | 
 35  | 
| 
 $4,000-4999  | 
 43.6  | 
 42  | 
 28.9  | 
 24  | 
| 
 $5,000-5999  | 
 31.2  | 
 26  | 
 23.4  | 
 48  | 
| 
 $6,000+  | 
 35  | 
 15  | 
 15.1  | 
 385  | 
| 
 Total Observations  | 
 504  | 
 577  | 
||
TABLE 3
Impact of Exogenous Variables on Regime Type (REG): Binomial Probit
Binomial Probit Model [where Democracy=0, Dictatorship=1]
| 
 Variable  | 
 Coefficients  | 
 Standard Errors  | 
| 
 Constant  | 
 3.947**  | 
 0.704  | 
| 
 STRA  | 
 0.173*  | 
 0.082  | 
| 
 COMEX  | 
 -0.340*  | 
 0.147  | 
| 
 NEWC  | 
 -0.253  | 
 0.228  | 
| 
 BRITCOL  | 
 -0.735**  | 
 0.201  | 
| 
 RELIGION  | 
 -0.0142**  | 
 0.004  | 
| 
 CATH  | 
 0.626*  | 
 0.283  | 
| 
 PROT  | 
 -0.385  | 
 0.430  | 
| 
 MOSLEM  | 
 1.029**  | 
 0.313  | 
| 
 ODRP  | 
 -2.734**  | 
 0.293  | 
| 
 ODWP  | 
 -1.927  | 
 1.548  | 
| 
 LEVEL  | 
 -0.000**  | 
 0.000  | 
Actual  | 
Predicted  | 
Total  | |
|   | 
0  | 
1  | 
|
0  | 
496  | 
81  | 
577  | 
1  | 
50  | 
454  | 
504  | 
Total  | 
546  | 
535  | 
1081  | 
TABLE 4
Impact of Exogenous Variables on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) by Regime Type
Ordinary Least Squares Model [Democracy=0, Dictatorship=1]
(Standard errors in parentheses)
Parameter  | 
Dictatorships  | 
Democracies  | 
| Constant | 134.437**  | 
3.595  | 
(10.087)  | 
(0.520)  | |
| COMEX | 1.278  | 
4.662**  | 
(2.686)  | 
(1.861)  | |
| EDT | -14.087**  | 
-1.847**  | 
(0.690)  | 
(0.362)  | |
| FERTIL | 2.397*  | 
10.169**  | 
(1.171)  | 
(0.764)  | |
| POP | -0.000**  | 
0.000**  | 
(0.000)  | 
(0.000)  | |
| LFPW | 0.461**  | 
0.535**  | 
(0.112)  | 
(0.108)  | |
| LEVEL | -0.003**  | 
-0.002**  | 
(0.001)  | 
(0.000)  | |
| LAMBDA | -15.940**  | 
-8.547**  | 
(3.960)  | 
(1.926)  | |
| N | 423  | 
520  | 
| Degrees of Freedom | 415  | 
512  | 
| F | 256.88  | 
315.60  | 
| Fit:R-squared | 0.81  | 
0.81  | 
| Fit:Adj.R-squared | 0.81  | 
0.81  | 
| Durbin-Watson final | 1.892  | 
1.859  | 
| Final Rho | 0.054  | 
0.070  | 
TABLE 5
Predicted Independent Effect of Regime Type on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)
Unbiased Values/Descriptive Statistics
(All results based on nonmissing observations)
| 
 Variable  | 
 Predicted Mean  | 
 Standard Deviation  | 
 Predicted Minimum  | 
 Predicted Maximum  | 
 # of Observations produced  | 
| 
 IMR Dictatorship  | 
 52.6  | 
 58.5  | 
 -85.1  | 
 168.5  | 
 943  | 
| 
 IMR Democracy  | 
 42.8  | 
 33.3  | 
 -4.52  | 
 141.6  | 
 943  | 
| 
 Difference  | 
 9.8  | 
 33.9  | 
 -103.64  | 
 79.1  | 
 943  | 
TABLE 6
Regime Type and Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) by Year in Selected Countries and Years
| 
 Country  | 
 Year (a)  | 
 Regime (b)  | 
 Observed IMR (c)  | 
 Predicted IMR Dictatorship (d)  | 
 Predicted IMR Democracy (e)  | 
 Difference f=(d-e)  | 
| 
 Burkina Faso  | 
 1967  | 
 Dic  | 
 185  | 
 168.5  | 
 93.5  | 
 75.0  | 
| 
 1982  | 
 Dic  | 
 149  | 
 162.5  | 
 93.8  | 
 68.8  | 
|
| 
 1987  | 
 Dic  | 
 138  | 
 161.0  | 
 98.2  | 
 62.8  | 
|
| 
 Brazil  | 
 1970  | 
 Dic  | 
 94.6  | 
 104.2  | 
 62.5  | 
 41.7  | 
| 
 1977  | 
 Dic  | 
 79  | 
 88.7  | 
 54.5  | 
 34.3  | 
|
| 
 1982  | 
 Dem  | 
 71  | 
 77.2  | 
 50.6  | 
 26.6  | 
|
| 
 1987  | 
 Dem  | 
 63  | 
 63.8  | 
 43.5  | 
 20.3  | 
|
| 
 China  | 
 1962  | 
 Dic  | 
 88  | 
 106.9  | 
 141.6  | 
 -34.7  | 
| 
 1970  | 
 Dic  | 
 69  | 
 72.9  | 
 130.9  | 
 -57.9  | 
|
| 
 1976  | 
 Dic  | 
 44  | 
 42.5  | 
 107.6  | 
 -65.0  | 
|
| 
 1980  | 
 Dic  | 
 42  | 
 27.2  | 
 105.1  | 
 -77.9  | 
|
| 
 1987  | 
 Dic  | 
 37  | 
 6.3  | 
 109.9  | 
 -103.6  | 
|
| 
 Egypt  | 
 1970  | 
 Dic  | 
 158.0  | 
 103.1  | 
 62.4  | 
 40.7  | 
| 
 1982  | 
 Dic  | 
 112.0  | 
 76.9  | 
 51.1  | 
 25.8  | 
|
| 
 1987  | 
 Dic  | 
 86.0  | 
 64.7  | 
 42.6  | 
 22.2  | 
|
| 
 Ethiopia  | 
 1967  | 
 Dic  | 
 162  | 
 161.8  | 
 84.9  | 
 76.8  | 
| 
 1972  | 
 Dic  | 
 155  | 
 160.0  | 
 84.8  | 
 75.2  | 
|
| 
 1982  | 
 Dic  | 
 159  | 
 156.1  | 
 96.4  | 
 59.7  | 
|
| 
 Greece  | 
 1961  | 
 Dem  | 
 39.8  | 
 83.6  | 
 27.6  | 
 56.0  | 
| 
 1964  | 
 Dem  | 
 35.8  | 
 76.4  | 
 27.6  | 
 48.9  | 
|
| 
 1970  | 
 Dic  | 
 34.3  | 
 58.1  | 
 24.0  | 
 34.1  | 
|
| 
 1974  | 
 Dem  | 
 23.9  | 
 47.3  | 
 22.3  | 
 25.0  | 
|
| 
 1984  | 
 Dem  | 
 14.3  | 
 28.4  | 
 13.2  | 
 15.3  | 
|
| 
 1987  | 
 Dem  | 
 11.7  | 
 16.7  | 
 8.4  | 
 8.3  | 
|
| 
 India  | 
 1967  | 
 Dem  | 
 145  | 
 97.3  | 
 108.8  | 
 -11.6  | 
| 
 1972  | 
 Dem  | 
 132  | 
 82.6  | 
 106.4  | 
 -23.8  | 
|
| 
 1982  | 
 Dem  | 
 108  | 
 53.3  | 
 104.0  | 
 -50.7  | 
|
| 
 1987  | 
 Dem  | 
 96  | 
 37.0  | 
 101.1  | 
 -64.0  | 
|
| 
 Indonesia  | 
 1970  | 
 Dic  | 
 118.0  | 
 110.5  | 
 76.3  | 
 34.1  | 
| 
 1977  | 
 Dic  | 
 105.0  | 
 96.4  | 
 68.9  | 
 27.4  | 
|
| 
 1982  | 
 Dic  | 
 95.0  | 
 84.3  | 
 61.1  | 
 23.2  | 
|
| 
 Mexico  | 
 1970  | 
 Dic  | 
 72.4  | 
 91.8  | 
 69.2  | 
 26.9  | 
| 
 1982  | 
 Dic  | 
 49.0  | 
 55.8  | 
 45.0  | 
 10.8  | 
|
| 
 1987  | 
 Dic  | 
 41.0  | 
 42.1  | 
 38.7  | 
 3.4  | 
|
| 
 Nicaragua  | 
 1967  | 
 Dic  | 
 115  | 
 110.7  | 
 81.8  | 
 29.0  | 
| 
 1972  | 
 Dic  | 
 100  | 
 104.9  | 
 77.9  | 
 27.0  | 
|
| 
 1982  | 
 Dic  | 
 68  | 
 87.5  | 
 66.6  | 
 20.9  | 
|
| 
 Nigeria  | 
 1970  | 
 Dic  | 
 139.4  | 
 145.8  | 
 94.5  | 
 51.2  | 
| 
 1972  | 
 Dic  | 
 135  | 
 144.1  | 
 93.3  | 
 50.8  | 
|
| 
 1982  | 
 Dem  | 
 95.7  | 
 130.1  | 
 91.9  | 
 38.2  | 
|
| 
 1987  | 
 Dic  | 
 87  | 
 115.4  | 
 83.3  | 
 32.2  | 
|
| 
 Pakistan  | 
 1967  | 
 Dic  | 
 145  | 
 130.2  | 
 79.1  | 
 51.1  | 
| 
 1982  | 
 Dic  | 
 120  | 
 116.0  | 
 80.3  | 
 35.8  | 
|
| 
 1987  | 
 Dic  | 
 104  | 
 109.3  | 
 72.8  | 
 36.5  | 
|
| 
 South Africa  | 
 1970  | 
 Dic  | 
 78.8  | 
 71.3  | 
 64.2  | 
 7.2  | 
| 
 1977  | 
 Dic  | 
 72.0  | 
 65.2  | 
 58.4  | 
 6.8  | 
|
| 
 1982  | 
 Dic  | 
 63.0  | 
 58.7  | 
 54.8  | 
 3.9  | 
|
| 
 Switzerland  | 
 1961  | 
 Dem  | 
 21.0  | 
 10.2  | 
 14.1  | 
 -3.1  | 
| 
 1970  | 
 Dem  | 
 15.4  | 
 14.1  | 
 7.7  | 
 6.3  | 
|
| 
 1974  | 
 Dem  | 
 12.4  | 
 7.8  | 
 2.9  | 
 4.9  | 
Appendix 1: Variables
The data set used for this paper was Alvarez, Cheibub, Limongi and Przeworski 1997, ACLP World Political / Economic Database. ACLP defines the variables used here as follows:
BRITCOL: British colony. Dummy variable coded 1 for every year in countries that had been a British colony any time after 1919, 0 otherwise.
CATH: Percentage of Catholics in the population.
COMEX: Primary commodity exporting country, as defined by the IMF.
EDT: Cumulative years of education of the average member of the labor force. (Bhalla-Lau-Louat series).
FERTIL: Total fertility rate (births per woman).
INFMORT: Infant mortality rate per 1,000 live births.
LEVEL: Level of economic development. Real GDP per capita, 1985 international prices, Chain index.
LFPW: Labor force, female (% of total).
MOSLEM: Percentage of Moslems in the population.
NEWC: New country. Dummy variable coded 1 for every year in countries that became independent after 1945, 0 otherwise.
ODRP: Democracies in the region (Percentage). Percentage of democratic regimes in the current year (other than the regime under consideration) in the REGION to which the country belongs.
ODWP: Democracies in the world (Percentage). Percentage of democratic regimes (other than the regime under consideration) in the world for the current year.
POP: Population, in thousands.
PROT: Percentage of Protestants in the population.
RELIGION: Percentage of population of the largest religious group, measured in the year for which data were available (roughly 1976-1985) as presented in The Economist (1988) and Vanhanen (1992). Time invariant variable.
STRA: Sum of transitions to authoritarianism. The sum of past transitions to authoritarianism in a country. If a country experienced a transition to authoritarianism before 1950, STRA was coded 1 in 1950.
YEAR: From 1950 or date of independence to 1990.
 
Appendix 2: LIMDEP Batch File
The statistical program used for this paper was LIMDEP Version 7.0, Econometric Software 1985–1997. A copy of the batch file follows:
TITLE; ********** INFMORT PROBITSEL 5-8-99 ****************** $
LOAD;		FILE=c:\statscom\WORLDSRT.INT $
READ;		file=c:\statscom\demogr.wk1; format=wks; names $
TITLE; ********** REJECT MISSING VALUES ********************* $
SAMPLE; 	1-4126 $
REJECT;	INFMORT < 0 $ REJECT;	INFMORT = 0 $
REJECT;	EDT = -9 $ REJECT;	FERTIL = -9 $
REJECT;	LFPW = -9 $ REJECT;	STRA = -9 $
NAME; XIMR= ONE, comex, edt, fertil, pop, lfpw, level $
REGRESS;	LHS=infmort;RHS=XG,REG $
NAME; XREG= one, stra, comex, newc, britcol, religion, cath, prot, moslem, odrp, odwp, level $
CALC; LIST; KXIMR=COL(XIMR) $
TITLE; ************ PROBIT WITH SELECTION ***************** $
PROBIT;	LHS= REG ;RHS= XREG ;HOLD(IMR=LAMBDA) $
TITLE; ************ HECKMAN TWO-STEP METHOD *************** $
TITLE; ************ OLS FOR DICTATORSHIPS ***************** $
REJECT;	REG=0 $
CREATE;	CL=COUNTRY [-1] $ (lags country)
CREATE;	IF (CL # COUNTRY) FLAGD=1 $
CREATE;	IF (CL # COUNTRY) FLAGA=0 $
CREATE;	IF (FLAGA=-999) FLAG1=0; ELSE FLAG1=FLAGA $
CREATE;	IF (FLAGD=-999) FLAG2=0; ELSE FLAG2=FLAGD $
CREATE;	FLAGN=FLAGA+FLAGD $
REJECT;	FLAGN=1 $
REGRESS;	LHS=infmort; RHS=XIMR,LAMBDA; AR1 $ 
MATRIX;	BAUT=PART(B,1,KXIMR) $
TITLE; ************* OLS FOR DEMOCRACIES ****************** $       
SAMPLE; 	1-4126 $
REJECT;	INFMORT = -9 $ REJECT;	INFMORT = 0 $
REJECT;	EDT = -9 $    REJECT;	FERTIL = -9 $
REJECT;	LFPW = -9 $ REJECT;	STRA = -9 $
REJECT;	REG=1 $ 
CREATE;	CL=COUNTRY [-1] $ (lags country)
CREATE;	IF (CL # COUNTRY) FLAGA=1 $
CREATE;	IF (CL # COUNTRY) FLAGD=0 $
CREATE;	IF (FLAGA=-999) FLAG1=0; ELSE FLAG1=FLAGA $
CREATE;	IF (FLAGD=-999) FLAG2=0; ELSE FLAG2=FLAGD $
CREATE;	FLAGN=FLAGA+FLAGD $
REJECT;	FLAGN=1 $
REGRESS;	LHS=infmort; RHS=XIMR,LAMBDA; AR1 $
MATRIX;	BDEM=PART(B,1,KXIMR) $
TITLE; ************** CALCULATE UNBIASED VALUES *********** $
SAMPLE;	1-4126 $
REJECT;	INFMORT < 0 $
REJECT;	INFMORT = 0 $
REJECT;	EDT = -9 $
REJECT;	FERTIL = -9 $
REJECT;	LFPW = -9 $
REJECT;	STRA = -9 $
REJECT;	FLAGN=1 $
CREATE;	IMR1 = DOT(XIMR,BAUT) $ (IMR1 is infmort under dic)
CREATE;	IMR0 = DOT(XIMR,BDEM) $ (IMR0 is infmort under dem)
CREATE;	DIMR=IMR1-IMR0 $ (DIMR is the difference)
DSTAT;		RHS=IMR1,IMR0,DIMR $
STOP
 
| || National Endowment for Democracy || 1101 15th Street, NW Suite 800 || Washington, D.C. 20005 USA || || || |